Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism

State shares take a toll in terms of performance and free markets

State-held shares are back on the agenda. Popular during Europe’s wave of privatisation in the 1970s and 80s, so called golden shares — spezialaktie in Germany — allowed governments to wield control over a slew of public companies including utilities and oil and gas majors. By far the bulk had been redeemed by the turn of the millennium.

With globalisation in retreat and protectionism firmly re-ensconced, British politicians are hoping to spark a revival. The defence committee wants them reinstated across defence companies, irked at US private equity owned Cobham’s $3.6bn bid for Ultra Electronics. More speciously, MP Tom Tugendhat is angling for a government share — and a 25.1 per cent stake — in Arm, the chip designer, which owner SoftBank plans to list in New York after its planned $40bn sale to Nvidia collapsed. Echoing Washington and Beijing, he argues that national security is part and parcel of technological leadership.

State shares, like those held by tech founders, take a toll in terms of performance and free markets. An asymmetric veto on takeovers deprives other shareholders of the opportunity to sell; a particular handicap in the UK’s M&A-heavy market. Take the redemption of golden shares in water and electricity utilities in the mid-1990s. To the dismay of politicians, this unleashed a flurry of bids and within two years all but one of the 12 regional electricity companies had been flogged.

The European Commission, more concerned at the impediment to the free flow of capital, was largely successful in stamping them out although holdouts — especially in the UK — remain. These include BAE and Rolls-Royce, both of which operate defence capabilities.

There is a case to be made for government vetoes when it comes to national security. Golden shares also have a use elsewhere, such as fostering environmental or social missions. The Thomson family’s founders’ share in Thomson Reuters, designed to safeguard independence and lack of bias in reporting, also makes sense. Slapping similar government rights on to tech companies does not.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

中国发掘科技人才以推动AI数据中心的蓬勃发展

北京正在整合私营和国有部门的资源,以加速采用这一快速发展的技术。

华盛顿计划如何捍卫美元

贸易关税成为头条新闻,但围绕金钱的不太明显的斗争对总统来说意义重大。

美国称矿产交易收入将推动乌克兰战后经济增长

基辅仍对该计划持怀疑态度,财政部长斯科特•贝森特在FT的评论文章中否认该计划是“强制性的”。

马斯克要求联邦员工解释他们的工作,否则将被解雇

亿万富翁通过电子邮件设定最后期限,加大裁减政府雇员的力度。

经济伙伴关系将保护乌克兰人民和美国纳税人的利益

特朗普果敢的国际领导力符合各方利益,惠及所有人。

巴菲特试图安抚股东对创纪录现金储备的担忧

亿万富翁投资者缩减了股票投资组合,并将资金投入美国国债。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×